Social Justice, Apologetic Vegans And Carnism.

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.62″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”off” comments=”off” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”below” parallax_method=”on” text_orientation=”left” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” border_style=”solid” date_format=”j M Y” /][et_pb_text background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.0.64″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid”]

Over the past few weeks it has been more than a little disheartening for me to see that among vegans, there is an increasing number of apologetic vegans, and support for the regulation/reform of animal agribusiness message seems to be growing at a quicker rate than the message calling for an end to animal use.

As I have written previously, I believe that the social acceptance v social justice view comes into play. Primarily due in no part to campaigns by Animals Australia and the various Animal Liberation groups who have made it socially acceptable, and almost a prerequisite of being vegan in Australia, to campaign for some sort of incremental reform.

In addition to the above, the latest article by Dr Melanie Joy, titled Speaking Truth to Power: Understanding the Dominant, Animal-Eating Narrative for Vegan Empowerment and Social Transformation at OneGreenPlanet.org I believe goes some way towards explaining a reason why this is happening.

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_cta _builder_version=”3.0.64″ url_new_window=”on” use_background_color=”on” background_layout=”dark” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”off” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_icon_placement=”right” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ title=”Become a supporter” button_text=”Join now” button_url=”https://veganpolice.com.au/join/” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”4405″]

Have you thought about becoming a supporter of the Vegan Police?

For only $3.00 per month, you the following:

  • Members only content
  • Extended and exclusive podcast episodes
  • discount on future webinars and training courses
  • and more…

[/et_pb_cta][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.64″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid”]

At the beginning of the article, Dr Joy tells us that “History is shaped by stories“, “Dominant narratives are the stories told by the dominant culture”, defining our reality and guiding our lives.

Dr Joy goes further to say that when the dominant culture is oppressive, it’s narratives are too. These fictitious narratives are “constructed to delude people into supporting the dominant way of life even though that way of life runs counter to what they would otherwise support, and to silence the voices of people who seek to tell the truth”

Whilst Dr Joy’s article is about the relationship between vegans and non-vegans, if we move it across to the different “camps” within the animal advocacy movement, we can see that the carnist ideology is still prevalent.

For example, the primary justification for the dominant ideology is that it is normal, natural and necessary, and the secondary justification seeks to make the non dominant position abnormal, unnatural and unnecessary.

With the regulationist position being the dominant one within the animal advocacy movement, we hear the justification for the position being that they are ‘doing something for the animals today and tomorrow”, that they actually do “care” for the animals that are in the system, and that by seeking gradual improvements, the system will eventually cease to exist. Therefore, it could be theorised that based on Dr Joy’s article, that these are all examples of the primary justification for adopting the regulationist position.

The secondary justification for the regulationist position is that the position of abolition within the animal rights context is that it is extreme or purist, that “we” don’t really care for the animals, that “we” aren’t doing anything for those animals in the system today.

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”adsense in-article” _builder_version=”3.0.64″ saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”4594″]<script async src=”//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js”></script><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –><ins class=”adsbygoogle”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> style=”display:block; text-align:center;”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-format=”fluid”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-layout=”in-article”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-client=”ca-pub-5634917449033535″<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-slot=”6296493813″></ins><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –><script><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –></script>[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.64″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid”]

The regulationists have an easily believed and routinely shared myth, that they are ‘doing something’ for the animals today and those who will come tomorrow. This is despite it being known that it takes months of campaigning for there even to be a discussion at governmental or industry level relating to the proposed change, and then months, if not years for the ‘improvement’ to take place. Then there is the very likely possibility of a number of years for phase ins at an ‘industry approved’ rate before the ‘improvement’ is fully in force, if at all.

This means that it could literally be a decade before the last animal is removed from a process that the regulationists claim they were stopping ‘today’.

And yet, for some unknown reason, it seems to make more sense to a majority of people to campaign for the above, rather than promote veganism, and in turn reduce the demand for all animal products, as it is seen as too hard.

Maybe Dr Joy is right in saying that there are vegans who still see things through the carnist ideology?

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”adsense in-article” _builder_version=”3.0.64″ saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”4594″]<script async src=”//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js”></script><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –><ins class=”adsbygoogle”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> style=”display:block; text-align:center;”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-format=”fluid”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-layout=”in-article”<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-client=”ca-pub-5634917449033535″<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> data-ad-slot=”6296493813″></ins><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –><script><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –></script>[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.64″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid”]

Updated: 23 July 2017 – Correct spelling mistakes and formatting

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]