Why Highchester ‘Shutdown’ Was A Failure

This article is a follow up piece to the article “Activists Shut Down Slaughterhouse… For Nothing“.

Since that time, I have received all sorts of condemnation and abuse.

Ranging from:

  • I don’t know what I am talking about
  • I am anti-vegan
  • I am a meat industry shill
  • I can’t see the bigger picture

So, I decided that another article, clearing up things up was warranted.

Before We Begin

Before we get into this, we need to understand one important thing.

The previous article, and most of the ones that appear on this site are written from an animal rights perspective.

You can find a short primer on animal rights here.

To me, animal rights is the right for other animals to be given equal consideration.

When an ‘animal rights group’ organises an event that not only ignores, they also fail to mention rights, I will get upset and write about it.

Was It Animal Rights Or Animal Welfare Protest?

This is where most of the confusion comes from.

A majority, if not all those involved appear to believe that this event was an “animal rights” event.

Except it wasn’t.

This whole campaign was about the way an animal was treated.

It wasn’t about the animal’s rights which are violated.

Nor was it about raising awareness of any rights that other animals have.

It was nothing more than a protest to improve ‘welfare’.

Subscribe to the Vegan Police Gazette

Here’s your chance to become a VeganPolice.com.au subscriber and be notified of new posts, updates, and all that good stuff related to dogmatic and purist veganism.


Why Not Seek An Animals Release

In a facebook discussion, a representative of Animal Liberation Queensland stated

The purpose of our action was to gain mainstream media attention to the dairy industry expose which we released 1.5weeks ago. Demanding the release of an animal would have meant that the message (standard industry practices) would have been lost.

In my mind, this is exemplary of the poverty of ambition that is ingrained within the “animal rights movement”.

And, a goal that is in conflict with the aim of the organisation.

Animal Liberation Queensland (ALQ) is an independent animal rights organisation, founded in 1979, which advocates the rights of non-human animals so that they may live free from abuse, cruelty, and exploitation. ALQ is a not-for-profit organisation in the state of Queensland and a registered charity.
Source: ALQ Facebook page

Chris Delforce director Aussie Farms. source: Facebook

Why Poverty Of Ambition?

How much attention did the stunt receive?

As mentioned in the previous article, it was 2 minutes on Channel 10 and 30 seconds on Channel 7, along with local paper articles.

It’s a week later now, and how many people who aren’t vegan remember what happened or why?

As I said in the previous article, negotiating the release of an animal can only reinforce any previous message.

Think about that for a minute.

How much greater would the impact of the realities of dairy be if the “hundreds of pledges” got regular emails about the life and story of calf #456?

(Yes, I do know bobby calves on that day didn’t have ear tags, though that isn’t the point).

Remember the #269 movement gets it’s name from the ear tag of a calf destined for slaughter.

Website Visits Are The Wrong Metric

A representative of Animal Liberation Queensland claims that the stunt was a success due to;

Hundreds of thousands reached on social media, tens of thousands of video views, thousands of website visits, hunderds of pledges to ditch dairy.

By this token, the past few articles I have written have been an over whelming success. They have been shared on social media, and traffic to the site has increased.

Stats from VeganPolice.com.au over the past 10 days

Except that is the wrong metric to go by.

What makes my website a success is people contacting me to ask for more information.

An animal rights protest can only be a success when people commit to going vegan.

Or the rights of animals are preserved

A pledge isn’t worth anything unless it is followed through with action.

Is The Condemnation Warranted?

Do you think the wrath of vegans that I have faced is warranted and justified?

It is if you know everything that there is to know about animal rights and animal advocacy.

If you don’t, then why do you think it is?

Is it because you think I have criticised hard working activists?
If you are honest, you will notice that I haven’t.

What I have done is criticise organisations for doing the wrong thing. It is these organisations that need to be held accountable for misleading activists into doing something that isn’t in alignment with their values.

Is it because I have commented on the actions of animal rights activists?
This protest was never an “animal rights” protest.

If animal rights activists participated in it, then they should have their motives questioned.

Is it because I criticised an “animal welfare” protest?
As, for want of a better term, an animal rights advocate, my goals are different to ‘animal welfare’ protests. So, I am more than able to do just that.

You want animals treated ‘better’.

I don’t want them objectified in the first place.

Is it because you don’t see me on the streets?
I’ve been there done that, and is no longer a priority for me. I can reach more people spending 2 or 3 hours writing an article for this blog than I ever could standing on a street corner. (For the record, I am not criticising those who do. I don’t want to spend my time doing it).

Search engine traffic to VeganPolice.com.au over the past 30 days. Courtesy of SemRush.com

If your position is sound, and you agree with your actions, then nothing I write should be able to upset you.

If it does or has, then it might be time for some soul searching to find out why.

Instead of going along with the status quo, think critically about your (in)actions. And think two, three or more steps ahead of where you are now.

Remember it was Sun Tzu who, in The Art Of War, said.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Content Protection by DMCA.com
Filed under: ArticlesTagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,

16 Comments

  1. You know veganism is truly reaching everyone, when someone goes and claims to be the vegan police and makes
    a pants on head retarded article like this.

    Just stop dude. If you really want to help, it’s you’ll be doing your best if you just be quiet.

    • WOW!!

      I didn’t think anyone used the word “retarded” anymore.

      Sadly your response is a perfect example of what is wrong with the “animal movement” in Australia.

      Rather than responding to the content, and pointing out parts that are incorrect, the first response is for personal attacks.

      Ahh well…

    • Hey schkorpio, 1945 called and they want their oppressive, archaic, ableist language back. I hope you’re not a vegan, we already have enough going against us, language like yours is the last thing we need!

  2. Sure, that word isn’t used to describe people with genuine disabilities, but I’m surprised you’re not familiar with people using it to describe people like you two.

    I mean, look at the amount of effort, time, energy and money you’ve spent on making a website to bash other vegans. You might as well be working for the dairy industry directly.

    • You really are a treasure, aren’t you?

      • Why don’t you come to a vigil instead of hiding on the internet?

        • They aren’t my thing

          And who says I am hiding on the internet?

          Unlike you, this is my real name. (so that means that I am not hiding)

    • Oh, for goodness sake. Sometimes it’s like being a kindergarten teacher explaining the most obvious things to “vegans” in this world. Of course “that word” (retarded) *is* used to describe (and to denigrate) people with disabilities and has been for decades. Where do you think the word came from? Give it some thought for about 30 seconds and it might hit you.

      Using the language of disability denigrates and insults others especially when it is used by someone without that disability. The term “retarded” suggests that those who hold opinions that differ from ours hold them due to a disability and obviously suggests that having such a disability is negative and undesirable.

      When a person brings your oppressive and offensive language to your attention, the decent thing to do is apologise, give it some degree of thought, self reflect and **learn** why another person brought your oppressive language to your attention.

      You are one of the reasons non-vegans look at veganism as privileged and are turned away. Can you imagine a person who has been diagnosed as retarded reading your vile comments? Do you think you will have given them reason to embrace veganism – where we denigrate and marginalise oppressed groups – or do you think you will have given them every reason to run as fast as possible away from the idea? Stop and think about the harm you’re causing – both to the movement and to the plight of other animals when you are responsible for turning good and decent people away with your oppressive and offensive language — and your unwillingness to address it. THAT ought to be your focus rather than attacking other vegans as you have here. Shame on you – both for attacking other vegans and for being so bigoted.

      • I’m not denigrating people with disabilities. I’m specifically targeting you two. If you can’t tell the difference it’s not my problem.

        • OMFG dude.

          Are you even vegan?

          I can’t see how you can be talking like that.

  3. Come to a vigil, I’ll give you a lift if you’re nearby. I think your perspective will change a lot.

    • Really?

      You go from abusing me to inviting me to a vigil in who knows where and even offer me a lift.

      Ahh. No thanks.

      I have seen that movie and it doesn’t end well.

      Trust me. Going to a vigil won’t change my perspective.
      Been there, done that, and don’t like the impact that it has on me or who I become

      • Well I tried being nice, and tried being mean. But please stop this nonsense about other vegans. It’s not helping.

        • So “nice” offer was fake?

          Well, lucky I didn’t take you up on it then, wasn’t it?

          Actually what isn’t helping other vegans is alleged “vegan animal rights” group NOT promoting veganism.

          NOT me writing about them not doing it.

  4. lol petty and pathetic I’m done here. It’s crystal clear to everyone that you’re just doing this as an ego trip, and so is your mate, who is probably you using a different account.

    • Petty and pathetic.

      Well that’s a case of pots and kettles if you ask me.

      Damn. Busted. You got me.

      I am doing this as an ego trip.

      As for claiming Gary is me, well I don’t know who Gary is. One thing I can tell you for sure is that the comments didn’t come from me.


What are your thoughts?